No patient is the ever same and this adage goes for anterior group shoulder dislocations (subcoracoid, subglenoid, and the rare subclavicular and intrathoracic). If you use the same technique every time there is going to be situations where you are simply using the wrong technique. That’s why I take an algorithmic approach to the patient in front of me. This includes addressing whether this patient needs an X-Ray, what type of injury they might have, whether this patient need sedating, and pre-planning what to do if Plan A fails. There are anatomical reasons why no technique works every time on every patient and it is important to be skilled in several methods so you can use the best method for each presentation. The techniques discussed rely upon the relative movements of the humeral head and the glenoid fossa of the scapula. Used correctly, these techniques require little or no force.
Here’s the generic algorithm, once you have mastered a few techniques you can adapt this to your particular skill set. For example, if your favourite zero position technique is FARES, then that fits into your own personal algorithm – my personal algorithmic approach appears below.
I'd also recommend declaring your plan to your patient and your team. 'Preparing to fail' is a great way to make good decisions in evolving situations especially when things aren't going to plan. Saying to your patient "I'm going to try a gentle technique using positioning and massage. Your shoulder may pop back in just with that, if not we are going to stop, get an X-ray, and get a bit more information before we try the next technique." This allows you to maintain the confidence of your patient (and yourself) if Plan A doesn't work, and stop you from spending too long on a technique that doesn't suit the patient or the injury.
For more detail on whether to X-Ray check out the FAQ section
There are currently no clear radiological guidelines to distinguish between these subtypes of anterior group dislocations. A retrospective case review (submitted for publication) has shown that one measurement on an AP X-Ray will consistently separate subcoracoid and subglenoid subtypes. This is the IGIANV - take the distance between landmark points of the inferior glenoid (IG) and the inferior point of the anatomical neck (IAN) which appears as a notch on the Xray. Then take the vertical (V) measurement.
<44mm is subcoracoid
>44mm is subglenoid
Guideline developed by myself and Dr Andrew Long
Green line - IG to IAN
Yellow line - horizontal level of IAN
Blue line - IGIANV
IGIANV<44mm is subcoracoid
IGIANV>44mm is subglenoid
There are two main clinical and radiological presentations for subcoracoid and subglenoid and a common variant for each.
SUBCORACOID - USUAL PRESENTATION
Small acromial step
Anterior fullness
Able to adduct
IGIANV <44mm
SUBGLENOID - USUAL PRESENTATION
Large acromial step
No anterior fullness*
Not able to adduct
IGIANV >44mm
*humeral head sitting in axilla so you can't feel it from the front
SUBCORACOID - VARIANT PRESENTATION
Cause - lots of spasm
Held in abduction (red lines)
Larger than expected acromial step (yellow angle)
Small IGIANV, large scapulohumeral angle
HH wedged up tight under coracoid – anterior fullness (blue arrow)
The big step and abducted position would make you think that this might be a SG type but the anterior fullness is the difference you can pick up clinically. It is the spasm that is causing the humeral head to be pulled up high towards the coracoid and the humerus out to the side.
SUBGLENOID - VARIANT PRESENTATION
Humeral head wedged beneath and medial to glenoid rim
Large greater tuberosity fracture fragment positioned lateral to glenoid rim
Humeral head sitting higher than expected for SG injury, IGIANV may be <44mm
Humerus in abduction
Copyright © 2018 DISLOCATION.COM.AU - All Rights Reserved.
Powered by GoDaddy
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.